Jump to content


Photo

Faster Than Light? Or Just A Wobbly Cable?


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
4 replies to this topic

#1 Noir

Noir

    JN Regular

  • Item DB Crew
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 231 posts
  • Neopets: Sonicblade128
  • jnAccount : noirthesable
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Outside the door to my happy place, rifling through my pockets for the keys.

Posted 22 February 2012 - 05:20 PM

Headline: Faster-than-light neutrino measurement has two possible errors
Date: February 22, 2012
Description: Scientists hypothesize that either an optic cable connecting a GPS unit to a receiver is the cause for a 60-ns discrepancy from the speed of light, or the measurement of the passage of time between the two atomic clocks used in the experiment was probably done incorrectly.
Link: http://blogs.nature....ble-errors.html

Full Story:
Spoiler


So there you go. Either the rules of Einsteinian physics have to be rewritten, or it could have possibly just been a loose cable. What sounds more reasonable?

I mean, I'm not putting off the hypothesis that it was really faster than light just yet -- they still need to run more tests to see what the proper cause was. But when it looks like there's an explanation that doesn't require as many new unproven assumptions...


#2 Clinton

Clinton

    Majestic Butterfly

  • Elite Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 771 posts

Posted 22 February 2012 - 05:42 PM

I wouldn't be surprised if the neutrinos are faster than light. They are pretty insane things. *knows a bit about neutrinos*

#3 Bjork

Bjork

    we spent life inside of our heads

  • Elite Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,120 posts

Posted 23 February 2012 - 08:42 AM

I wouldn't be surprised if the neutrinos are faster than light. They are pretty insane things. *knows a bit about neutrinos*


Well let's see, when Neutrinos pretty much came from the start of the Universe, it shouldn't be surprising that they're by faster then light.

#4 Chev

Chev

    Your average nerd… from space!™

  • Elite Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 788 posts

Posted 23 February 2012 - 02:52 PM

I wouldn't be surprised if the neutrinos are faster than light. They are pretty insane things. *knows a bit about neutrinos*


Well let's see, when Neutrinos pretty much came from the start of the Universe, it shouldn't be surprising that they're by faster then light.

Depends on what "start of creation" theory you're subscribing to.

But anyway, I thought there was a catch when I heard about the experiment originally. It's going to take a lot to debunk Einstein!

#5 Bjork

Bjork

    we spent life inside of our heads

  • Elite Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,120 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 08:55 AM

I wouldn't be surprised if the neutrinos are faster than light. They are pretty insane things. *knows a bit about neutrinos*


Well let's see, when Neutrinos pretty much came from the start of the Universe, it shouldn't be surprising that they're by faster then light.

Depends on what "start of creation" theory you're subscribing to.

But anyway, I thought there was a catch when I heard about the experiment originally. It's going to take a lot to debunk Einstein!


Meh, I believe in connection between science and such.

Mmhmm. The only place where Einstein's theory of Relativity is void is in a Black Hole(I.E. Singularity)




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users